One point that I'm covering on certain Health and Safety Training courses is Section 40 of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974. We are generally of the opinion that we are innocent until proven guilty. In the case of Health and Safety, this is not always the case. It is often the case that we need to (be able to) prove our innocence!
Health and Safety at Work, etc. Act 1974 - Section 40: Onus of proving limits of what is practicable, etc.
In any proceedings for an offence under any of the relevant statutory provisions consisting of a failure to comply with a duty or requirement to do something "so far as is practicable", or "so far as is reasonably practicable", or to use the "best practicable means" to do something, it shall be for the accused to prove (as the case may be) that it was not practicable or not reasonably practicable to do more than was in fact done to satisfy the duty or requirement, or that there was no better practicable means than was in fact used to satisfy the duty or requirement.
What does this mean?
In real terms it means that it is not for the prosecution to prove guilt, but for the defence to show that they are not guilty. Ouch! How are you set up to demonstrate that you have reduced the risks "to as low a level as is reasonably practicable"?
Need Help? Contact us
No comments:
Post a Comment