Active
monitoring is an important aspect of modern safety management that appears to
be very difficult for some companies to accept and to buy into. It is the things that we do that generally
keep employees (and other persons) from harm; but it is the records and
documents that we keep (and complete) that help to protect the Company.
A Scottish case from a few years
ago helps to put this into context:
M (a Scottish tyre-fitting firm) was fined £10,000 for failing (in the words of the Procurator Fiscal) to “give effect to arrangements that were appropriate for monitoring and reviewing its health and safety policy. It didn’t check that people were actually following it.” Regulation 5 of the Management of Health and Safety Work Regulations 1999 places a duty on employers to ensure effective planning, control, monitoring and review of the preventive and protective measures within their health and safety arrangements. This point is expanded with the Approved Code of Practice that supports the Regulations where the point is made that “Active monitoring reveals how effectively the health and safety management system is functioning”Events
The
case followed a traffic incident in which one of T’s employees and the driver
of a broken-down (client) lorry were killed at the road side. One of M’s tyre fitters attended an early
morning breakdown on the A90 Dundee-Aberdeen road. The broken-down vehicle had stopped in the
nearside lane (no hard shoulder available on this stretch) and the hazard
warning lights had been switched on. The
section of the road in that area was unlit and, according to witnesses on the
road at the time of the crash, the two drivers could barely be seen. This indicates that they were not wearing
high-visibility jackets. Unfortunately,
the driver of a third vehicle failed to spot the breakdown in time and collided
with the broken down truck, shunting it into the recovery vehicle, which had
been parked in front and killed the two men on the scene. The driver of this third vehicle pleaded
guilty to a charge of reckless driving.
Findings
During
the investigation into the incident, the HSE discovered that M had a good, up
to date, written Health and Safety Policy that addressed issues such as the
wearing of Hi-visibility fluorescent
jackets, the placing of traffic cones at the site of the breakdown and parking
the recovery vehicle between the broken down vehicle and the oncoming traffic. It also discovered, however, that none of
these measures had been implemented in practice. The court heard that M’s
driver had seen the policy and had signed it to acknowledge that he had read it. It also heard that the Company had carried
out a vehicle check about a month before the accident. According to Procurator Fiscal,
the failing of M was in not putting into
practice what it had put down on paper. The Company could not demonstrate that it
monitored the use and effectiveness of policies and procedures or the control
measures arising from its risk assessments.
It did not take enough steps to ensure that its employees were working
to the Company’s procedures.
Summary
This
case highlights the fact that it is not enough to have a health and safety
policy and expect everyone within the organization to understand it and to work
to that policy. People must receive
suitable and sufficient training in the policy and then the effectiveness of
the policy must be established. Active
Monitoring of Health & Safety is important for protecting employees and
organisations.
Please visit our website
No comments:
Post a Comment